In 1927, Werner Heisenberg proposed that there are fundamental limitations
to the study of subatomic particles, as the act of measuring them affects t
heir behavior. Here we show that experimenter-induced uncertainty also appl
ies in plant ecology, with potentially dramatic consequences for field biol
ogists. We tested whether the simple act of visiting marked plants once per
week for eight weeks influenced the intensity of herbivory experienced by
six plant species in an old field community. Half of the plants were touche
d once per week to simulate taking morphological measures, while the other
half were left undisturbed (neither Visited nor touched). After eight weeks
, visitation resulted in (1) decreased leaf damage by insects on one specie
s, (2) increased leaf damage on a second species, (3) a marginally signific
ant increase in survival for a third species, and (4) no effect on the rema
ining three species. These results serve as an important reminder that seem
ingly benign experimental methods may themselves dramatically affect the pe
rformance of experimental subjects. Our results raise concern about studies
that use repeated visitation of focal plants either to compare rates of he
rbivory among species or to investigate some factor that can either directl
y or indirectly be influenced by the rate of herbivory (e.g., seed producti
on, competition, etc.). Since The six species in our study responded differ
ently to visitation, visitation effects must be accounted for in the design
of future field experiments.