Gender variation in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae): Is size all that matters?

Gender in flowering plants is governed by a complex interplay of genetic an d environmental factors. The perennial aquatic herb Sagittaria latifolia di splays remarkable variation within and among populations in gender expressi on, from monoecious populations composed of plants with differing numbers o f female and male flowers to completely dioecious populations with separate female and male plants. Here we examine the role of environmental factors in modifying gender expression in these two sexual systems by investigating the relation between ramet size and flower number in three sex phenotypes (hermaphrodite, female, and male). In particular, we assess the extent to w hich hermaphroditic plants have the option of altering the number of female and male flowers to accommodate their specific environmental circumstances . We sampled 12 populations from diverse wetland habitats in southern Ontar io, Canada, estimated their phenotypic gender, and examined the relations b etween ramet size and a range of vegetative and floral traits. On average, plants from dioecious and monoecious populations did not differ in leaf len gth, a correlate of ramet size. However, in monoecious populations with sig nificant numbers of both male and hermaphroditic ramets, hermaphrodites wer e larger and produced more flowers than males. This contrasting pattern was also observed when plants were grown under glasshouse conditions. In monoe cious populations, variation in ramet size did not affect the production of male flowers, whereas female flower production varied positively with plan t size. These relations enabled statistical prediction of the dependence of gender on plant size and the frequency distribution of gender within monoe cious populations. These relations also imply that the male phenotype can b e determined environmentally, whereas the female phenotype cannot. The size dependence of floral sex ratios in monoecious populations provides novel i nsights into the likely evolutionary pathway by which dioecy has evolved fr om monoecy in Sagittaria.