According to the concept of canalisation, infants and children stay within
one or two growth channels, and therefore, any crossing of height centiles
always warrants further evaluation. In view of evidence against this concep
t we re-investigated the variability of individual growth in the First Zuri
ch Longitudinal Growth Study. The investigation is based on height measurem
ents of 232 children (112 females, 120 males) measured at annual intervals
during childhood and half-yearly during adolescence. Height data were trans
formed into height standard deviation scores (SDS) and canalisation defined
by the width of an individual's growth channel, i.e., by the differences b
etween maximum and minimum height SDS, in the individual series of measurem
ents. Many subjects of the First Zurich Longitudinal Growth Study crossed n
umerous centiles with patterns that often seemed to show characteristic fea
tures. For approximately two thirds of the subjects, the SDS channel during
the whole growth process covers more than one SDS. In childhood, between t
he age of two and age of minimal height velocity, only about one fourth of
the subjects have an SDS channel below 0.5, indicating acceptable canalisat
ion. During childhood, growth in boys appeared slightly more canalised than
in girls (P = 0.02).
Conclusion The present investigation does not support the concept of strict
canalisation of individual growth. We suggest to consider crossing of cent
iles a normal event in child development, though in a clinical setting cros
sing centiles should still be taken seriously, at least at first until a me
dical cause for this has been excluded.