Increased numbers of clinical trials, many of which are large, multicenter,
and sometimes international, and the marked shift of funding for clinical
trials to industry have made apparent the inadequacy of mechanisms for prot
ecting human subjects that were developed when clinical research was genera
lly carried out on a small scale at single institutions. To address concern
s regarding the protection of human subjects, a group of professionals with
expertise in various aspects of clinical trials was assembled in May 2000,
Participants described and evaluated the mechanisms by which clinical tria
ls are monitored, focusing on adverse event reporting and the processes by
which various parties with oversight responsibilities interact in the cours
e of these trials. In this article, we describe the manner in which adverse
event reporting might function to enhance safety and the role of data moni
toring committees in using aggregate data from these reports, outline the p
roblems that now exist for institutional review boards as they are faced wi
th multiple adverse event reports from clinical trials while conducting con
tinuing review, and offer recommendations for improving the current approac
h.