C. Schuster et A. Von Eye, The relationship of ANOVA models with random effects and repeated measurement designs, J ADOLESC R, 16(2), 2001, pp. 205-220
Understanding ANOVA models is often difficult because of the large amount o
f different experimental designs presented in applied textbooks. This artic
le shows how different experimental designs arise out of the variation of t
hree basic distinctions: block versus treatment factors, fixed versus rando
m factors, and crossed versus nested factors. Once it is understood how eac
h distinction influences the statistical analysis, the amount of experiment
al designs can be considerably reduced, because sometimes seemingly differe
nt experimental designs are essentially equivalent. This is shown by an exa
mple comparing a two-way analysis of variance model to a three-factor parti
ally nested design Furthermore, the way each distinction influences the sta
tistical analysis of an experimental design can simplify the computational
effort of the analysis because virtually every basic ANOVA procedure implem
ented in common statistical software packages can be used to fit more compl
ex ANOVA models that are usually analyzed using special computer modules.