Comparison of amplified ELISA and mouse bioassay procedures for determination of botulinal toxins A, B, E, and F

Authors
Citation
Jl. Ferreira, Comparison of amplified ELISA and mouse bioassay procedures for determination of botulinal toxins A, B, E, and F, J AOAC INT, 84(1), 2001, pp. 85-88
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Agricultural Chemistry
Journal title
JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
10603271 → ACNP
Volume
84
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
85 - 88
Database
ISI
SICI code
1060-3271(200101/02)84:1<85:COAEAM>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
The amplified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (amp-ELISA) was compared to the mouse bioassay for determination of botulinal neurotoxin types A, B, E , and F, Twelve different toxin-producing type A, 13 proteolytic type B, 9 nonproteolytic type B, 16 type E, 8 proteolytic type F, 5 nonproteolytic ty pe F, and 6 nontoxigenic clostridial strains were tested, The cultures were inoculated into cooked meat medium (CMM) and tryptone-peptone-glucose-yeas t extract (TPGY) medium, incubated for 5 days, and then examined for biolog ical toxicity in mice and amp-ELISA endpoints, The amp-ELISA was less sensi tive in detecting toxins produced by nonproteolytic than proteolytic strain s of type B and F organisms. All of the toxin-producing strains tested were positive by the AOAC method and the amp-ELISA in either undiluted TPGY or CMM culture fluids regardless of mouse toxicity level, source, or strain. C ross-reactivity was observed between some but not all of the botulinal stra ins tested, None of the nontoxigenic strains were positive by the amp-ELISA , Purified botulinal toxins were also assayed using these 2 methods. The se nsitivity of the amp-ELISA using purified neurotoxins was about 0.1 ng/mL f or types A, B, and E and about 1.0 ng/mL for type F.