Frequency of macroprolactinemia due to autoantibodies against prolactin inpregnant women

Citation
D. Pascoe-lira et al., Frequency of macroprolactinemia due to autoantibodies against prolactin inpregnant women, J CLIN END, 86(2), 2001, pp. 924-929
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
ISSN journal
0021972X → ACNP
Volume
86
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
924 - 929
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-972X(200102)86:2<924:FOMDTA>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The frequency of macroprolactinemia related to the presence of anti-PRL aut oantibodies in the serum of 209 healthy women at different stages of pregna ncy was studied. Measurements were taken of serum PRL concentrations before and after chromatographic separation (gel filtration and affinity with pro teins A and G) and extraction of free PRL with polyethylene glycol(PEG). Se ra from 8 of the 209 women (3.8%) were found to have a significantly high p roportion of precipitated PRL by PEG (macroprolactinemia); in these patient s, gel filtration showed that a substantial amount of big big PRL (molecula r mass >100 kDa) was present (19.0-78.2% vs. 3.8-4.9%, P = 0.009 in normal pregnant women with a normal proportion of precipitated PRL by PEG). The pr esence of macroprolactinemia was attributable to anti-PRL autoantibodies in 5 of the 8 women. Comparison of serum levels of direct and free PRL betwee n women with macroprolactinemia related to anti-PRL autoantibodies and wome n without macroprolactinemia showed significant differences (direct PRL: 27 0.2 +/- 86.9 vs. 203.4 +/- 69.0 mug/L, P = 0.04; and free PRL: 107.0 +/- 75 .9 vs. 173.3 +/- 67.6 mug/L, P = 0.002). On the other hand, there was no di fference between women with macroprolactinemia not related to anti-PRL auto antibodies and women with macroprolactinemia caused by anti-PRL autoantibod ies, nor was there a difference between women with macroprolactinemia not r elated to anti-PRL autoantibodies and women without macroprolactinemia. The re was a positive correlation between titers of the anti-PRL autoantibody a nd serum PRL levels (r = 0.82, P = 0.09). The presence of the anti-PRL auto antibody had no relation to the patient's age, stage of gestation, or numbe r of previous pregnancies. We concluded that the frequency of macroprolacti nemia was 3.8% among healthy, pregnant women, which was caused by a anti-PR L autoantibodies in 62.5% of the cases. The autoantibodies were found in th e bloodstream, forming a PRL-IgG complex, in accordance with the following observations: 1) immunoreactive PRL on gel filtration was eluted in the fra ctions corresponding to the molecular mass of IgG (150 kDa); 2) a significa ntly high proportion of immunoreactive PRL was retained on an affinity gel for IgG (proteins A and G); and 3) a significantly high proportion of serum PRL bound to IgG was precipitated by protein A. There was a positive corre lation between titers of anti-PRL autoantibodies and serum PRL levels. Seru m levels of total PRL were higher, and serum levels of free PRL were lower, in pregnant women with anti-PRL autoantibodies than in pregnant women with out macroprolactinemia.