Polycystic ovarian syndrome: Evidence that flutamide restores sensitivity of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator to inhibition by estradiol and progesterone

Citation
Ca. Eagleson et al., Polycystic ovarian syndrome: Evidence that flutamide restores sensitivity of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator to inhibition by estradiol and progesterone, J CLIN END, 85(11), 2000, pp. 4047-4052
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
ISSN journal
0021972X → ACNP
Volume
85
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
4047 - 4052
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-972X(200011)85:11<4047:POSETF>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a complex disorder with multiple abno rmalities, including hyperandrogenism, ovulatory dysfunction, and altered g onadotropin secretion. The majority of patients have elevated LH levels in plasma and a persistent rapid frequency of LH (GnRH) pulse secretion, the m echanisms of which are unclear. Earlier work has suggested that the sensiti vity of the GnRH pulse generator to inhibition by ovarian steroids is impai red. We performed a study to determine whether antiandrogen therapy with fl utamide could enhance feedback inhibition by estradiol (E-2) and progestero ne (P) in women with PCOS. Ten anovulatory women with PCOS and nine normal centrals (days 8-10 of the cycle) were studied on three occasions. During e ach admission, LH and FSH were determined every 10 min and E-2, P, and test osterone (T) every 2 h for 13 h. After 12 h, GnRH (25 ng/kg) was given iv. After the first admission, patients were started on flutamide (250 mg twice daily), which was continued for the entire study. The second admission occ urred on days 8-10 of the next menstrual cycle for normal controls and on s tudy day 28 for PCOS patients. Subjects were then given E-2 transdermally ( mean plasma E-2, 106 +/- 18 pg/mL) and P by vaginal suppository to obtain v aried plasma concentrations of P (mean P, 4.4 +/- 0.5 ng/mL; range, 0.6-9.0 ng/mL), and a third study was performed 7 days later. At baseline women with PCOS had higher LH pulse amplitude, response to GnRH , T, androstenedione, and insulin and lower sex hormone-binding globulin co ncentrations (P < 0.05). Most hormonal parameters were not altered by 4 wee ks of flutamide, except T in controls and E-2 and FSH in PCOS patients, whi ch were lower. Of note, flutamide alone had no effect on LH pulse frequency or amplitude, mean plasma LH, or LH responsiveness to exogenous GnRH. Afte r the addition of E-2 and P for 7 days, both PCOS patients and normal contr ols had similar reductions in LH pulse frequency (4.0 +/- 0.7 and 5.8 +/- 0 .7 pulses/12 h, respectively). This contrasts with our earlier results in t he absence of flutamide, where a plasma P level of less than 10 ng/mL had m inimal effects on LH pulse frequency in women with PCOS, but was effective in controls. These results suggest that all though the elevated LH pulse fr equency in PCOS may in part reflect impaired sensitivity to E-2 and P, cont inuing actions of hyperandrogenemia are important for sustaining the abnorm al hypothalamic sensitivity to feedback inhibition by ovarian steroids.