Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-II, IGF-binding protein-3, and prostate-specific antigen as predictors of clinical prostatecancer
Sm. Harman et al., Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-II, IGF-binding protein-3, and prostate-specific antigen as predictors of clinical prostatecancer, J CLIN END, 85(11), 2000, pp. 4258-4265
Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) may play a role in prostate growth, hype
rplasia, and malignancy. High plasma IGF-I has been associated with increas
ed prostate cancer risk. In a prospective, cohort, case-control study in th
e Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging population, we examined prostate vo
lume by magnetic resonance imaging, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA), IG
F-I, IGF-II, and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) in sera obtained approxima
tely 9 yr before diagnosis of prostate cancer in cases (n = 72) or age-matc
hed controls (n = 127) and in 76 additional Baltimore Longitudinal Study on
Aging men (normal subjects) with measured prostate volumes and no prostate
cancer. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) by logistic regression, re
lative risks for significant ORs, and receiver operator curves for prostate
cancer, using serum measures alone and in combination. Adjusted ORs for th
e high vs, low tertile were: for IGF-I, 3.1 [confidence interval (CI), 1.1-
8.7]; for IGF-II, 0.2 (CI, 0.07-0.6); for IGFBP-3, 0.71 (CI, 0.3-1.7); and
for PSA, 12.5 (CI, 3.8-40.9). For significant ORs, relative risk estimates
remained significant at 2.0 for IGF-I, 0.3 for IGF-II, and 5.5 for PSA. Rec
eiver operator curves showed PSA to be the most powerful predictor of prost
ate cancer. Adding IGF-II to PSA improved prediction. IGF-II was significan
tly and inversely related (r = -0.219; P < 0.01) and PSA was directly and s
ignificantly related (r = 0.461; P < 0.0001) to prostate volume, whereas IG
F-I and IBFBP-3 were not. High IGF-I and low IGF-II are independently assoc
iated with increased risk of prostate cancer, but PSA level is a much stron
ger predictor of prostate cancer in the ensuing 10 yr than either IGF-I or
IGF-II. The absence of a relationship of IGF-I to prostate size is inconsis
tent with increased ascertainment in men with large prostates as the source
of greater prostate cancer risk associated with IGF-I. Our data suggest th
at IGF-II may inhibit both prostate growth and development of prostate canc
er.