The Traumatic Brain Injury Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-166) gave new author
ity to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in the Unite
d States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to establish a gran
t program for states to assist in addressing the needs of persons with trau
matic brain injury (TBI). The resulting State Demonstration Grant Program h
as made available two categories of grants: planning and implementation. Pl
anning grants are awarded to assist states in building infrastructure throu
gh the development of four core components. One of the core components is a
statewide needs and resource assessment encompassing the full spectrum of
services, from initial acute treatment through rehabilitation and long-term
community supports. In 1999. assessments completed in 11 states were subje
cted to a comparative analysis to identify trends across states and to extr
act salient issues for the State Demonstration Grant Program. This article
summarizes the context of the HRSA-funded needs assessments and contrasts t
he methods of needs assessment utilized. Over-arching issues are discussed,
including exemplary qualitative and quantitative methods. and the diversit
y of theoretical models employed in designing assessments and interpreting
findings. Several limitations in approaches were also identified, including
shortcomings of convenience samples for conducting mail surveys and the un
likely validity of using a needs and resource discrepancy approach to ident
ify gaps in services.