The recent concern to develop a radical but critical account of agency in s
ocial policy is to be welcomed. However this article questions whether the
work of A. Giddens can provide an adequate foundation for such a project. G
iddens's account of the welfare subject contains several weaknesses. It is
voluntaristic and yet paradoxically it cannot offer an adequate understandi
ng of radical change, It is also rationalistic and assumes the existences o
f a unitary and knowledgeable subject. As a consequence there is a danger t
hat social policy develops a lop-sided model of agency which is insufficien
tly sensitive to the passionate, tragic and contradictory dimensions of hum
an experience. A robust account of the active welfare subject must be prepa
red to confront the real experiences of powerlessness and psychic injury wh
ich result from injustice and oppression and acknowledge human capacities f
or destructiveness towards self and others. Only by exploring these differe
nt subject positions - victim, 'own worst enemy' and creative, reflexive ag
ent - can we develop an understanding of the welfare subject which is optim
istic without being naive.