Simple method for estimating regurgitant volume with use of a single radius for measuring proximal isovelocity surface area: An in vitro study of simulated mitral regurgitation
T. Tokushima et al., Simple method for estimating regurgitant volume with use of a single radius for measuring proximal isovelocity surface area: An in vitro study of simulated mitral regurgitation, J AM S ECHO, 14(2), 2001, pp. 104-113
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) color Doppler method with use
of a hemielliptic formula is reported to be accurate for quantitating regur
gitant volume (RV). However, this formula ideally requires the measurement
of 2 or 3 radii and therefore is not widely used clinically. The purpose of
this in vitro study was to derive a simple PISA formula for estimating RV
with use of a single radius axial to the valve orifice and to compare it wi
th the clinically used single-radius hemispherical formula (2 x pi x R-2 x
AV x TVI/Vp), where AV is the apparent color Doppler aliasing velocity, R i
s the PISA. color Doppler aliasing radius, TVI is time-velocity integral of
the jet by continuous wave Doppler, and Vp is the peak velocity of the jet
by continuous wave Doppler. Pulsatile flow studies were performed across a
convex curvilinear surface, which more closely approximates the shape of t
he mitral valve than does a planar surface. Pulse rates (60 to 80 bpm), pea
k now velocities (4.0 to 6.0 m/s), and regurgitant orifice areas (0.2 to 1.
0 cm(2))were varied to simulate mitral regurgitation. The AVs were varied f
rom 11 to 39 cm/s, and a single PISA aliasing radius was measured at each A
V. Excellent linear correlations were obtained between the PISA radius and
the actual RV measured with use of a beaker (r = 0.94 to 0.97, P < .0001).
A series of simplified formulas was derived from the regression line of the
PISA radius versus the RV. For example, with an AV of 21 cm/s, RV was esti
mated by a simplified PISA formula (where RV [mL] = 10 x R [mm] - 30) with
are accuracy of 3.3 +/- 6.3 mL versus -20.3 +/- 8.7 mt for the standard sin
gle-radius PISA method (P < .0001). By using the standard single-radius hem
ispherical PISA formula, RV was underestimated if the radius was <20 mm. By
using simplified regression equations, the PISA radius accurately estimate
d RV at a PISA radius <20 mm. Clinical studies are necessary to validate th
is concept.