Although tropical forest birds are known to prey upon small lizards and fro
gs, no study has documented the attributes of vertebrate-eating birds or wh
ether birds prey opportunistically on the different elements of the herpeto
fauna within tropical communities. This study is based on a 14-mo investiga
tion on avian diet, supplemented with a 3-y census of frogs and a 1-y censu
s of lizards in a humid forest of central Panama. From 91 bird species, 108
6 regurgitates were collected, in which were found 75 lizards and 53 frogs.
Over 50% of the common, primarily insectivorous bird species preyed upon l
izards or frogs, with a mean frequency of 0.26 prey/sample. These birds (22
species, nine families) foraged on various substrates from different strat
a of the forest, fed on invertebrates averaging from 3.3 to 17.2 mm in leng
th, weighed from 11 to 195 g, and had bill lengths that varied from 12.2 to
49.8 mm. Based on a logistic regression analysis, intensity of foraging at
army-ant swarms was the variable that best explained the likelihood that a
bird species preyed upon lizards, leading to a classification that was 91%
correct. In contrast, bill length and body length classified correctly 88%
of the frog-eating birds, which showed a fairly constant 1:7 bill length/b
ody length ratio (as opposed to a mean but highly variable 1:10 ratio in ot
her species). A multiple regression analysis showed that seasonal variation
in intensity of lizard predation was positively related to arthropod abund
ance except during the breeding season when lizard intake decreased, presum
ably because nesting birds did not follow ant swarms. Intensity of frog pre
dation correlated with frog abundance over time, the latter being inversely
related to arthropod availability. Ninety-seven per cent of all lizards an
d frogs identified in the diet samples (n = 105) were from two genera, Anol
is and Eleutheradactylus, respectively. Prey size distribution in the regur
gitates suggested an optimal prey size of 33.5 mm snout-vent length (SVL) f
or lizards and 14.5 mm SVL for frogs. Birds preyed opportunistically on the
different Anolis species, but almost exclusively upon juvenile individuals
. Abundances of the different Eleutherodactylus species correlated with the
ir predation rates, but these frogs represented only 10% of all the frogs o
bserved during the censuses. The two most common local anurans, Colostethus
flotator and Bufo typhonius, were not taken by any bird species.