Lung function tests in asthma: Which indices are better for assessment of severity?

Citation
Vh. Ratageri et al., Lung function tests in asthma: Which indices are better for assessment of severity?, J TROP PEDI, 47(1), 2001, pp. 57-59
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS
ISSN journal
01426338 → ACNP
Volume
47
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
57 - 59
Database
ISI
SICI code
0142-6338(200102)47:1<57:LFTIAW>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Pulmonary function tests are objective evidence of the severity of asthma. A cross-sectional study was carried out to determine the sensitivity of var ious pulmonary function indices in picking up clinically diagnosed mild and severe asthma. Three groups, each with 60 subjects between 5 and 15 years all of either sex, with mild asthma, severe asthma, and without asthma, res pectively, were studied. Pulmonary function tests were performed using a po rtable spirometer, FEV1 and FVC could differentiate mild asthma from non-as thmatic children in 38 (63 per cent) and 35 (58 per cent), respectively. FE F25% and FEF75% could identify 46 (77 per cent), and 47 (78 per cent) of mi ld asthmatic children. In children with severe asthma, FEV1, FVC, FEF25%, a nd FEF75% were abnormal in 54 (90 per cent), 48 (80 per cent), 58 (97 per c ent) and 56 (94 per cent), respectively. Peak expiratory flow rate was abno rmal in 77 per cent of mild and 87 per cent of severe asthmatics. The FEV1/ FVC ratio showed no significant difference between asthmatics and non-asthm atics. It is concluded that FEF25% and FEF75% are better indices for assess ment of severity of asthma than FEV1 and FVC. The ratio FEV1/FVC is not use ful.