D. Gall et al., Evaluation of the fluorescence polarization assay and comparison to other serological assays for detection of brucellosis in cervids, J WILDL DIS, 37(1), 2001, pp. 110-118
The complement fixation test (CFT), competitive enzyme immunoassay (CELISA)
, indirect enzyme immunoassay (IELISA) and fluorescence polarization assay
(FPA) were evaluated for the detection of antibodies to Brucella abortus an
d Brucella suis biotype 4 in caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou), elk (Cerv
us elapus), red deer (Cervus elapus), and reindeer (Rangifer tarandus taran
dus). When combining the data the FPA and the CELISA were determined to be
the most suitable tests for serodiagnosis of Cervidae. The overall actual s
ensitivity of the CFT and the IELISA was 100%. The overall actual sensitivi
ty for the CELISA and FPA was 99%. The overall relative specificity of the
CFT (including treatment of anti-complementary data as positive or negative
for analysis), the CELISA, the IELISA and the FPA were 65%, 93%, 99%, 99%,
and 99%, respectively. The specificities of the buffered plate agglutinati
on test (BPAT), the CFT, the CELISA, the FPA and the IELISA for 55 elk vacc
inated with B. abortus strain 19 and tested 4 mo post vaccination were 14%,
31%, 51%, 84%, and 2%, respectively. The FPA is the diagnostic test of cho
ice because it has sensitivity and specificity values comparable to the CEL
ISA; it has the capability to distinguish vaccinal antibody and antibody re
sulting from exposure to crossreacting organisms such as Yersinia enterocol
itica 0:9 from antibody to Brucella spp, in most cases; it is technically s
imple to do; it is adaptable to field use and it is relatively inexpensive.