Diallel and triallel analysis in an acid soil tolerant maize (Zea mays L.)population

Citation
La. Narro et al., Diallel and triallel analysis in an acid soil tolerant maize (Zea mays L.)population, MAYDICA, 45(4), 2000, pp. 301-308
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
MAYDICA
ISSN journal
00256153 → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
301 - 308
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-6153(2000)45:4<301:DATAIA>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
The diallel analysis has been used mainly to estimate general-(GCA) and spe cific combining ability (SCA) effects for a fixed sample of parents and les s frequently to estimate components of variance for a random sample of pare nts of the reference population. In both cases, only additive and deviation s due to dominance effects can be estimated, assuming thar epistasis is neg ligible. The triallel analysis allows the estimation of epistasis variance because more ancestors are available and more covariances among relatives c an be estimated. The maize (Zea mays L.) population SA-8 was used to estima te components of variance through the generation of single- and three-way c rosses with a random sample of 50 S1 lines. Replicated trials were planted in ten environments, including seven acidic and three non-acidic soils. Eac h trial consisted of 400 entries, 100 single- and 300 three-way crosses. Yi elds on non-acidic soils averaged 70% greater than on acidic soils. Within a given soil type (non-acidic or acidic), single crosses were similar to th ree-way crosses in overall mean, maximum, and minimum values for grain yiel d, clays to 50% silk emergence, and plant height. For these traits, GCA and SCA sum of squares were highly significant using the triallel and diallel analyses For acidic soils, and across environments; although an overestimat ion for GCA effects for the diallel analysis was observed. Estimation of co mponents of variance using the triallel and diallel data for the full model showed that sigma (2)(AD), and sigma (2)(AA) explained 79 and 19% of the g enetic variance respectively, and both were highly significant; sigma (2)(A ) explained less than 2% of the generic variance. On the other hand, using the reduced model, sigma (2)(A) and sigma (2)(D) were significant and expla ined 37 and 63% of the genetic variation, respectively. The results, using the diallel data only, are in agreement with the reduced model. These resul ts suggest that epistasis was important in the SA-8 maize population. The s imilar grain yields for single- and three-way crosses in the present study suggest that both types of hybrids would be suitable to increase maize yiel ds in acidic and non-acidic environments of the developing countries.