Incorporating dynamic collimator motion in Monte Carlo simulations: an application in modelling a dynamic wedge

Citation
F. Verhaegen et Hh. Liu, Incorporating dynamic collimator motion in Monte Carlo simulations: an application in modelling a dynamic wedge, PHYS MED BI, 46(2), 2001, pp. 287-296
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary
Journal title
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00319155 → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
287 - 296
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-9155(200102)46:2<287:IDCMIM>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
In radiation therapy, new treatment modalities employing dynamic collimatio n and intensity modulation increase the complexity of dose calculation beca use a new dimension, time, has to be incorporated into the traditional thre e-dimensional problem. In this work, we investigated two classes of samplin g technique to incorporate dynamic collimator motion in Monte Carlo simulat ion. The methods were initially evaluated for modelling enhanced dynamic we dges (EDWs) from Varian accelerators (Varian Medical Systems, Pale Alto, US A). In the position-probability- sampling or PPS method, a cumulative proba bility distribution function (CPDF) was computed for the collimator positio n, which could then be sampled during simulations. In the static-component- simulation or SCS method, a dynamic field is approximated by multiple stati c fields in a step-shoot fashion. The weights of the particles or the numbe r of particles simulated for each component field are computed from the pro bability distribution function (PDF) of the collimator position. The CPDF a nd PDF were computed from the segmented treatment tables (STTs) for the EDW s. An output correction factor had to be applied in this calculation to acc ount for the backscattered radiation affecting monitor chamber readings. Co mparison of the phase-space data from the PPS method (with the step-shoot m otion) with those from the SCS method showed excellent agreement. The accur acy of the PPS method was further verified from the agreement between the m easured and calculated dose distributions. Compared to the SCS method, the PPS method is more automated and efficient from an operational point of vie w. The principle of the PPS method can be extended to simulate other dynami c motions, and in particular, intensity-modulated beams using multileaf col limators.