In retrospect, the 1997 media furor over the cloning of Dolly the sheep was
remarkable not so much for any lasting effects on opinion or policy it mig
ht have produced as for changing the frame of public debate about biotechno
logy generally to one that explicitly incorporated ethical considerations.
This essay discusses the nature and implications of this shift, based on th
e author's study of elite US newspaper coverage of this controversy up to a
nd just beyond Dolly's momentary fame. While ethical considerations found t
heir way into mainstream media discourse about biotechnology in ways that h
ad previously been uncommon and that may have had significant influence on
the subsequent history of the debate, this happened with little visible lon
g-term disruption of "status quo" institutional control over outcomes. The
cloning debate may even have diverted public attention from some aspects of
the biotechnology controversy at the same time as it created new public sp
ace for ethical debate over others.