Clinical significance of low titer anti-nuclear antibodies in early rheumatoid arthritis: implications on the presentation and long-term course of the disease

Citation
D. Caspi et al., Clinical significance of low titer anti-nuclear antibodies in early rheumatoid arthritis: implications on the presentation and long-term course of the disease, RHEUM INTL, 20(2), 2001, pp. 43-47
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology,"da verificare
Journal title
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
01728172 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
43 - 47
Database
ISI
SICI code
0172-8172(200102)20:2<43:CSOLTA>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of an ti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) detected in the early; stages of rheumatoid art hritis (RA), by a retrospective comparison of the clinical. laboratory. and therapeutic characteristics of patients with or without ANA. The files of 99 longstanding seropositive RA patients were reviewed. Data relating to de mographics, medical history, family history, physical findings, extra-artic ular complications, laboratory tests, drugs [dosage, duration, efficacy, co mbinations, adverse effects: (AEs)], intra-articular injections, and surger y were recorded. Patients with or without ANA at presentation of their dise ase were compared using chi-square and t-tests. Fifty-two ANA positive (gro up 1) and 47 ANA negative (group 2) patients were enrolled in the study. Al l were comparable in terms of their mean age, age at diagnosis, follow-up d uration (similar to 10.5 years), and male:female (M:F) ratio. On admission, pain complaints were more pronounced in group I (P = 0.004 in the feet), b ut the physical findings did not differ. Deformities and nodules developed in similar numbers. Extra-articular complications were evenly distributed; vasculitis, however, was significantly more prevalent in ANA positive (10/5 2) than in ANA negative (2/47) patients. Thyroid disease was more common in group 2 (10/47 vs 3/52), Laboratory tests (presentation and maximal values ) were similar, with the exception of higher anti-DNA (but within normal ra nges) and gamma -globulin% in group 1. Group 1 used more drugs prior to dia gnosis. Corticosteroids and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were evenly used. Combination therapy, joint injections. and surgery were more prevalent in group 2. AEs to various DMARDs were more common in group I. Although similar in many aspects, RA patients with ANA tend to present w ith more pain complaints, a higher risk of vasculitis and AEs relating to u se of DMARDs, while those without ANA needed more aggressive therapeutic mo dalities.