Comparison between 3D power Doppler ultrasound, color Doppler ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery disease.

Citation
M. Keberle et al., Comparison between 3D power Doppler ultrasound, color Doppler ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery disease., ROFO-F RONT, 173(2), 2001, pp. 133-138
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN
ISSN journal
14389029 → ACNP
Volume
173
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
133 - 138
Database
ISI
SICI code
1438-9029(200102)173:2<133:CB3PDU>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Purpose: To compare easy-to-perform three-dimensional power Doppler ultraso und (3D PDUS) to color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) and digital subtraction an giography (DSA) in the assessment of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenoses in patients with severe atherosclerosis. Methods: 26 ICA's (7 without sten osis, 4 low-, 4 middle-, and 11 high-grade stenoses) in 13 patients were ex amined with DSA, CDUS, and 3D PDUS. CDUS and 3D PDUS were performed with a 7.5 MHz standard transducer and a Sonoline Elegra ultrasound machine. The t hree methods were performed and interpreted by different persons who were n ot aware of the diagnoses. Resuits: Regarding the degree of stenosis correl ations between DSA and 3D PDUS were r=0.98 (p<0.001), between DSA and CDUS r=0.97 (p<0.001), and between CDUS and 3D PDUS r=0.95 (p<0.001). Sensitivit y and specificity regarding the detection of a high-degree stenosis was 90% and 100% for 3D PDUS, and 100% and 93.3% for CDUS. Conclusion: Even in cas es with severe atherosclerosis, both sonographic methods reveal similar res ults comparable to DSA. 3D PDUS does not result in a diagnostic improvement on CDUS, however, it does give the new opportunity for complete data stora ge, reconstruction, and survey presentations.