Watershed models such as SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) simulate wat
er quality impacts of land and water resource management alternatives. To s
imulate these impacts, long-term daily rainfall data are necessary. In the
absence of measured rainfall data, watershed models use weather generators
to simulate rainfall events. The objective of this study is to examine seve
ral daily precipitation generators in terms of the hydrologic response of S
WAT SWAT is generally applied to large river basins but has been validated
and applied on the small watershed scale as well. Daily rainfall inputs inc
luded a 60-year measured rainfall record from 1939 to 1998 for Riesel, Texa
s, in the heart of the Blackland Prairie, and data generated with the preci
pitation components of three weather generation programs: WGEN, WXGEN, and
USCLIMATE. Measured and generated rainfall were input into SWAT and run for
a 53 ha watershed near Riesel, Texas. Rainfall totals, extreme rainfall ev
ents, and the resulting hydrologic responses of runoff volume and peak flow
s were then examined. For this study scenario, WXGEN was able to more close
ly match observed rainfall than WGEN and USCLIMATE, In terms of resulting S
WAT hydrologic response, WXGEN rainfall best reproduced runoff volumes simu
lated with measured rainfall, and USCLIMATE performed better in reproducing
peak runoff rates. These are important results as probabilities of exceedi
ng runoff volume or peak flow thresholds are often questions of interest in
watershed projects.