Langmuir adsorption isotherms of endotoxin and aluminum-containing adjuvant
s at pH 7.4 and 25 degreesC revealed that aluminum hydroxide adjuvant has a
greater adsorption capacity (283 mug/mg Al) and adsorption coefficient (1.
3 x 10(4) ml/mug) than aluminum phosphate adjuvant (3.0 mug/mg Al, 0.20 ml/
mug). The difference in endotoxin adsorption was related to two adsorption
mechanisms: electrostatic attraction and covalent bonding. The isoelectric
point (iep) of endotoxin is approximately 2. An electrostatic attractive fo
rce will be present with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (iep = 11.4), and an e
lectrostatic repulsive force will operate with aluminum phosphate adjuvant
(iep = 4.6). Endotoxin contains two phosphate groups in the lipid A portion
. Covalent bonding occurs with surface aluminum in aluminum hydroxide adjuv
ant but is inhibited by surface phosphate in aluminum phosphate adjuvant. I
n-vitro desorption experiments using components of interstitial fluid showe
d that endotoxin adsorbed by aluminum hydroxide adjuvant was not desorbed b
y interstitial anions (5 mM phosphate or 2.7 mM citrate) or interstitial pr
oteins (25 mg albumin/ml). The effect of aluminum-containing adjuvants on t
he systemic response of Sprague-Dawley rats to a 15 mug/kg subcutaneous dos
e of endotoxin was determined by measuring the serum concentration of tumor
necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). TNF-alpha and
IL-6 were observed in the group which received an endotoxin solution or end
otoxin and aluminum phosphate adjuvant. No TNF-alpha or IL-6 was detected i
n the group that received endotoxin and aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. Alumin
um hydroxide adjuvant detoxifies endotoxin by adsorbing it in the vaccine a
nd then not releasing it in interstitial fluid upon administration. (C) 200
1 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.