G. Jones et al., Acoustic identification of bats from directly sampled and time expanded recordings of vocalizations, ACTA CHIROP, 2(2), 2000, pp. 155-170
We review how time-expanded recordings and direct sampling of sound can be
used to identify some bat species from their vocalizations, and how such me
thods may be applied to field surveys of bat activity. Some species emit di
stinctive social calls that permit identification, and social calls may be
individually distinctive within species. Analysis of echolocation calls can
identify cryptic species that are very similar in appearance, but differ i
n echolocation calls. Echolocation calls vary according to ecology and morp
hology both across and within species. Although some species emit distincti
ve echolocation calls, great care must be used in the acoustic identificati
on of other species, especially in cluttered habitats. Species identificati
on from echolocation calls is best approached by quantitative analysis, suc
h as discriminant function analysis (DFA) based on several measurements tak
en from calls. DFA gives an objective measure of confidence in species iden
tification, and can be applied to surveys of habitat use providing that cer
tain limitations are recognised. Discrimination of species from their echol
ocation calls may be improved by quantifying the shape of calls from their
frequency-time course, and by using artificial neural networks. Feeding rat
es can be estimated in bat detector surveys. though not all terminal buzzes
emitted prior to prey capture are associated with successful capture of pr
ey. Time expansion and direct sampling methods retain more detail of indivi
dual echolocation calls than do other methods. Not only can these methods b
e used to a certain extent for species identification and habitat use studi
es, they remain the only suitable methods for describing call design in bat
s from a detailed bioacoustics perspective.