Phylogenetic relationships within Celastraceae were inferred using a simult
aneous analysis of 61 morphological characters and 1123 base pairs of phyto
chrome B exon 1 from the nuclear genome. No gaps were inferred. and the gen
e tree topology suggests that the primers were specific to a single locus t
hat did not duplicate among the lineages sampled. This region of phytochrom
e B was most useful for examining relationships among closely related gener
a. Fifty-one species from 38 genera of Celastraceae were sampled. The Celas
traceae sensu late (including Hippocrateaceae) were resolved as a monophyle
tic group. Loesener's subfamilies and tribes of Celastraceae were not suppo
rted. The Hippocrateaceae were resolved as a monophyletic group nested with
in a paraphyletic Celastraceae sensu stricto. Goupia was resolved as more c
losely related to Euphorbiaceae, Corynocarpaceae. and Linaceae than to Cela
straceae. Plagiopteron (Flacourtiaceae) was resolved as the sister group of
Hippocrateoideae. Brexia (Brexiaceae) was resolved as closely related to E
laeodendron and Pleurostylia. Canotia was resolved as the sister group of A
canthothamnus within Celastraceae. Perrottetia and Mortonia were resolved a
s the sister group of the rest of the Celastraceae. Siphonodon was resolved
as a derived member of Celastraceae. Maytenus was resolved as three dispar
ate groups, suggesting that this large genus needs to be recircumscribed.