E. Zarate et al., The use of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation for preventing nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery, ANESTH ANAL, 92(3), 2001, pp. 629-635
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Nonpharmacologic techniques may be effective in preventing postoperative na
usea and vomiting (PONV). This sham-controlled, double-blinded study was de
signed to examine the antiemetic efficacy of transcutaneous acupoint electr
ical stimulation (TAES) in a surgical population at high risk of developing
PONV. We studied 221 outpatients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy w
ith a standardized general anesthetic technique in this randomized, multice
nter trial. In the TAPS group, an active ReliefBand(R) (Woodside Biomedical
, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) device was placed at the P6 acupoint, whereas in the
Sham and Placebo groups, an inactive device was applied at the P6 acupoint
and at the dorsal aspect of the wrist, respectively. The ReliefBand was app
lied after completion of electrocautery and remained in place for 9 h after
surgery. The incidence of PONV and need for "rescue" medication were evalu
ated at predetermined time intervals. TAES was associated with a significan
tly decreased incidence of moderate-to-severe nausea as denoted on the Func
tional Living Index-Emesis score for up to 9 h after surgery (5%-11% for th
e TAES group vs 16%-38% [P < 0.05] and 15%-26% [P < 0.05] for Sham and Plac
ebo groups, respectively). TAPS was also associated with a larger proportio
n of patients free from moderate to severe nausea symptoms (73% vs 41% and
49% for Sham and Placebo groups, respectively; P < 0.05). However, there we
re no statistically significant differences among the three groups with reg
ard to incidence of vomiting or the need for rescue antiemetic drugs. We co
nclude that TAPS with the ReliefBand at the P6 acupoint reduces nausea, but
not vomiting, after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.