Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging as marker of synovial membrane regeneration and recurrence of synovitis after arthroscopic knee joint synovectomy: a one year follow up study
M. Ostergaard et al., Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging as marker of synovial membrane regeneration and recurrence of synovitis after arthroscopic knee joint synovectomy: a one year follow up study, ANN RHEUM D, 60(3), 2001, pp. 233-236
Objectives-By repeated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to study synovial m
embrane regeneration and recurrence of synovitis after arthroscopic knee jo
int synovectomy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other (non-R
A) causes of persistent knee joint synovitis.
Methods-Contrast enhanced MRI was performed in 15 knees (nine RA, six non-R
A) before and one day, seven days, two months, and 12 months after arthrosc
opic synovectomy. Synovial membrane volumes, joint effusion volumes, and ca
rtilage and bone destruction were assessed on each MRI set. Baseline micros
copic and macroscopic assessments of synovitis and baseline and follow up s
tandard clinical and biochemical examinations were available.
Results-Synovial membrane and joint fluid volumes were significantly reduce
d two and 12 months after synovectomy. However, MRI signs of recurrent syno
vitis were already present in most knees at two months. No significant diff
erences between volumes in RA. and non-RA knees were seen. Synovial membran
e volumes at two months were significantly inversely correlated with the du
ration of clinical remission, for all knees considered together (Spearman's
correlation r(s)=-0.67; p<0.05), for RA knees (r(s)=-0.76; p<0.05), and fo
r non-RA knees (r(s)=-0.83; p<0.05). Baseline volumes were not significantl
y correlated with clinical outcome, Only three knees (all RA) showed erosiv
e progression. The rate of erosive progression was not correlated with MRI
volumes or with clinical or biochemical parameters.
Conclusion-The synovial membrane had regenerated two months after arthrosco
pic knee joint synovectomy and despite significant volume reductions compar
ed with baseline it often showed signs of recurrent synovitis. MRI seems to
be valuable as a marker of inflammation, destruction and, perhaps, as a pr
edictor of therapeutic outcome in arthritis.