Monotherapy with intravenous followed by oral high-dose ciprofloxacin versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as initial empiric therapy for granulocytopenic patients with fever
H. Giamarellou et al., Monotherapy with intravenous followed by oral high-dose ciprofloxacin versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as initial empiric therapy for granulocytopenic patients with fever, ANTIM AG CH, 44(12), 2000, pp. 3264-3271
The aim of the present study was to obtain clinical experience with the use
of high-dose ciprofloxacin as monotherapy for the treatment of febrile neu
tropenia episodes (granulocyte count, <500/mm(3)) compared to a standard re
gimen and to clarify whether ciprofloxacin administration may be switched t
o the oral route. In a prospective randomized study ciprofloxacin was given
at 400 mg three times a day (t.i.d.) for at least 72 h followed by oral ad
ministration at 750 mg twice a day (b.i.d). That regimen was compared with
ceftazidime given intravenously at 2 g t.i.d. plus amikacin given intraveno
usly at 500 mg b.i.d. The frequency of successful clinical response without
modification at the end of therapy was almost identical for ciprofloxacin
(50% [62 of 124 patients]) compared with that for ceftazidime plus amikacin
(50.8% [62 of 122 patients]) in an intent to treat analysis; the frequenci
es were 48.3% (57 of 118 patients) versus 49.6% (56 of 113 patients), respe
ctively, in a per-protocol analysis (P values for one-sided equivalence, 0.
0485 and 0.0516, respectively; <delta> = 10%), with no significant differen
ces among patients with bacteremia and other microbiologically or clinicall
y documented infections and fever of unknown origin. For 82 (66.1%) patient
s, it was possible to switch from parenteral ciprofloxacin to the oral cipr
ofloxacin, and the response was successful for 61 (74.1%) patients. The eff
icacies of the regimens against streptococcal bacteremias were 16.6% (one o
f six patients) for the ciprofloxacin group and 33.3% (one of three patient
s) for the combination group (it was not statistically significant), with o
ne breakthrough streptococcal bacteremia observed among the ciprofloxacin-t
reated patients. Adverse events were mostly self-limited and were observed
in 27 (20.6%) ciprofloxacin-treated patients and 26 (19.7%) patients who we
re receiving the combination. This study demonstrates that high dose ciprof
loxacin given intravenously for at least 3 days and then by the oral route
is therapeutically equivalent to the routine regimen of intraveneous ceftaz
idime plus amikacin even in febrile patients with severe neutropenia (polym
orphonuclear leukocyte count, <100 mm(3)). However, it is very important th
at before an empirical therapy is chosen each hospital determine bacteriolo
gic predominance and perform resistance surveillance.