Double blind, randomised controlled clinical trial of hypo-osmolar oral rehydration salt solution in dehydrating acute diarrhoea in severely malnourished (marasmic) children

Aims-To compare the clinical efficacy of hypo-osmolar oral rehydration salt (ORS) solution (224 mmol/l) and standard ORS solution (311 mmol/l) in seve rely malnourished (marasmic) children having less than 60% Harvard standard weight for age with dehydrating acute watery diarrhoea. Methods-In a double blind, randomised, controlled trial, 64 children aged 6 -48 months were randomly assigned standard (n = 32) or hypo-osmolar ORS (n = 32). Results-Stool output (52.3 v 96.6 g/kg/day), duration of diarrhoea (41.5 v 66.4 hours), intake of ORS (111.5 v 168.9 ml/kg/day), and fluid intake (214 .6 v 278.3 ml/kg/day) were significantly less in the hypo-osmolar group tha n in the standard ORS group. Percentage of weight gain on recovery in the h ypo-osmolar group was also significantly less (4.3 v 5.4% of admission weig ht) than in the standard ORS group. A total of 29 (91%) children in the sta ndard ORS group and 32 (100%) children in the hypo-osmolar group recovered within five days of initiation of therapy. Mean serum sodium and potassium concentrations on recovery were within the normal range in both groups. Conclusion-Our findings suggest that hypo-osmolar ORS has beneficial effect s on the clinical course of dehydrating acute watery diarrhoea in severely malnourished (marasmic) children. Furthermore, children did not become hypo natraemic after receiving hypo-osmolar ORS.