Positioning long lines: contrast versus plain radiography

Citation
A. Reece et al., Positioning long lines: contrast versus plain radiography, ARCH DIS CH, 84(2), 2001, pp. F129-F130
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
ISSN journal
00039888 → ACNP
Volume
84
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
F129 - F130
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9888(200103)84:2<F129:PLLCVP>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Aim-To assess the value of contrast versus plain radiography in determining radio-opaque long line tip position in neonates. Methods-In a prospective study, plain radiography was performed after inser tion of radio-opaque long lines. If the line tip was not visible on the pla in film, a second film with contrast was obtained in an attempt to visualis e the tip. Results-Sixty eight lines were inserted during the study period, 62 of whic h were included in the study. In 31, a second radiographic examination with contrast was necessary to determine position of the tip. In 29 of these, t he line tip was clearly visualised with contrast. On two occasions, the lin e tip could not be seen because the contrast had filled the vein and obscur ed the tip from view. Eight of the lines that required a second radiograph with contrast were repositioned. Conclusion-Intravenous contrast should be routinely used in the assessment of long line position in the neonate.