Chandra study of an overdensity of X-ray sources around two distant (z similar to 0.5) clusters

Citation
M. Cappi et al., Chandra study of an overdensity of X-ray sources around two distant (z similar to 0.5) clusters, ASTROPHYS J, 548(2), 2001, pp. 624-638
Citations number
71
Categorie Soggetti
Space Sciences
Journal title
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
0004637X → ACNP
Volume
548
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Part
1
Pages
624 - 638
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-637X(20010220)548:2<624:CSOAOO>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
We present results from a Chandra X-Ray Observatory study of the field X-ra y source populations in four different observations: two high-redshift (z s imilar to 0.5) clusters of galaxies 3C 295 and RX J003033.2+261819; and two noncluster fields with similar exposure time. Surprisingly, the 0.5-2 keV source surface densities (similar to 900-1200 sources deg(-2) at a flux lim it of 1.5 x 10(-15) ergs cm(-2) s(-1)) measured in an similar to 8' x 8' ar ea surrounding each cluster exceed by a factor of similar to2 the value exp ected on the basis of the ROSAT and Chandra log N-log S, with a significanc e of similar to 2 sigma each, or similar to 3.5 sigma when the two fields a re combined (i.e., a probability to be a statistical fluctuation of < 1% an d < 0.04%, respectively). The same analysis performed on the noncluster fie lds and on the outer chips of the cluster fields does not show evidence of such an excess. In both cluster fields, the summed 0.5-10 keV spectrum of t he detected objects is well fitted by a power law with Gamma similar to 1.7 similar to active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and shows no sign of intrinsic ab sorption. The few (similar to 10 of 35) optical identifications available t o date confirm that most of them are, as expected, AGNs, but the number of redshifts available is too small to allow conclusions on their nature. We d iscuss possible interpretations of the overdensity in terms of a statistica l variation of cosmic background sources; a concentration of AGNs and/or po werful starburst galaxies associated with the clusters; and gravitational l ensing of background QSOs by the galaxy clusters. All explanations, however , are difficult to reconcile with the large number of excess sources detect ed. Deeper X-ray observations and more redshifts measurements are clearly r equired to settle the issue.