The central X-ray point source in Cassiopeia A

Citation
D. Chakrabarty et al., The central X-ray point source in Cassiopeia A, ASTROPHYS J, 548(2), 2001, pp. 800-810
Citations number
137
Categorie Soggetti
Space Sciences
Journal title
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
0004637X → ACNP
Volume
548
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Part
1
Pages
800 - 810
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-637X(20010220)548:2<800:TCXPSI>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
The spectacular "first light" observation by the Chandra X-Ray Observatory revealed an X-ray point source near the center of the 300 yr old Cas A supe rnova remnant. We present an analysis of the public X-ray spectral and timi ng data. No coherent pulsations were detected in the Chandra/HRC data. The 3 sigma upper limit on the pulsed fraction is less than 35% for P > 20 ms. The Chandra/ACIS spectrum of the point source may be fitted with an ideal b lackbody (kT = 0.5 keV) or with blackbody models modified by the presence o f a neutron star atmosphere (kT = 0.25-0.35 keV), but the temperature is hi gher and the inferred emitting area lower than expected for a 300 yr old ne utron star according to standard cooling models. The spectrum may also be f itted with a power-law model (photon index Gamma = 2.8-3.6). Both the spect ral properties and the timing limits of the point source are inconsistent w ith a young Crab-like pulsar but are quite similar to the properties of the anomalous X-ray pulsars. The spectral parameters are also very similar to those of the other radio-quiet X-ray point sources in the supernova remnant s Pup A, RCW 103, and PKS 1209-52. Current limits on an optical counterpart for the Cas A point source rule out models that invoke fallback accretion onto a compact object if fallback disk properties are similar to those in q uiescent low-mass X-ray binaries. However, the optical limits are marginall y consistent with plausible alternative assumptions for a fallback disk. In this case, accreting neutron star models can explain the X-ray data, but a n accreting black hole model is not promising.