Although it is now well established that the conspicuous male plumage color
s of many birds hal-e been subject to sexual selection by female choice, it
is still debated whether females mate with colorful males to obtaiI1 direc
t or indirect benefits. In species where males provide substantial parental
care, females may obtain direct benefits from mating with the males that a
re best at providing care. The good parent hypothesis suggests that male pl
umage coloration signals a male's ability to provide parental care. Alterna
tively, the differential-allocation hypothesis suggests that colorful males
reduce their care in response to increased investment by females mated to
attractive males. We tested these hypotheses on the bluethroat (Luscinia s.
suecica), a socially monogamous, sexually dichromatic bird, in which males
have a colorful throat patch consisting of a structurally derived blue are
a surrounding a melanin-based chestnut spot. Male plumage coloration was ob
jectively quantified by use of reflectance spectrometry. We found no eviden
ce of a relationship between male coloration of either the blue patch or th
e chestnut spot and the level of paternal care. Nor were there any correlat
ions between male coloration and body size or body condition. Thus, our stu
dy does not support the hypothesis that male coloration signals male parent
al quality (the good parent hypothesis) or the hypothesis that colorful mal
es reduce their care in response to increased investment by females (the di
fferential-allocation hypothesis).