The comparison of click beetle and railroadworm luciferases (pH-insensitive
) with firefly luciferases (pH-sensitive) showed a set of conserved residue
s differing between the two groups which could be involved with the biolumi
nescence spectra pH sensitivity. The substitution C258V in Pyrocoelia miyak
o (Pml) firefly luciferase and V255C in Ragophthalmus ohbai railroad worm l
uciferase (Rol) had no effect on the bioluminescence spectra. Substitution
of Thr226 in the green-light-emitting luciferases of Rol and Pyrearinus ter
mitilluminans (Pyt) click beetle luciferases resulted in red-shifts (12 to
35 nm), whereas the substitution T226N in the red-light-emitting luciferase
of Phrixothrix hirtus (PhRE) railroadworm resulted in a 10 nm blue-shift.
In PmL the substitution N230S resulted in a typical red mutant (lambda (max
) = 611 nm). The bioluminescence spectrum of all these luciferase mutants d
id not show altered pH-sensitivity nor considerably changed half-bandwidth
in relation to the wildtype luciferases. Altogether present data suggest th
at Thr226 is an important residue for keeping active-site core in both grou
ps of beetle luciferases. The mechanism for bioluminescence color determina
tion between pH-sensitive and pH-insensitive luciferases could be different
. (C) 2001 Academic Press.