Two experiments used Information Integration Theory to study how children j
udge expected value of complex gambles in which alternative outcomes have d
ifferent prizes. Six-year-olds, 9-year-olds and adults (N = 73 in Study 1,
N = 28 in Study 2) saw chance games that involved shaking a marble in a bic
olored tube. One prize was won if the marble stopped on blue, another if it
stopped on yellow. Children judged how happy a puppet playing the game wou
ld be, with the prizes and probability of the blue and yellow outcomes vari
ed factorially. Three main results appeared in both studies: First, partici
pants in all age groups used the normatively prescribed multiplication rule
for integrating probability and value of each individual outcome-a strikin
g finding because multiplicative reasoning does not usually appear before 8
years of age in other domains. Second, all age groups based judgment of ov
erall expected value meaningfully on both alternative outcomes, but there w
ere individual differences-many participants deviated from the normative ad
dition rule, showing risk seeking and risk averse patterns of judgment simi
lar to the risk attitudes often found with adults. Third, even the youngest
children took probability to be an abstract rather than physical property
of the game. Overall, in contrast to the traditional view, the present resu
lts demonstrate functional understanding of probability and expected value
in children as young as 5 or 6. These results contribute to the growing evi
dence on children's intuitive reasoning competence. This intuition can, on
the one hand, support surprisingly precocious performance in young children
, but it may also contribute to the biases evident in adults' judgment and
decision.