This article describes the path-mapping theory of how humans integrate anal
ogical mapping and general problem solving. The theory posits that humans r
epresent analogs with declarative roles, map analogs by lower-level retriev
al of analogous role paths, and coordinate mappings with higher-level organ
izational knowledge. Implemented in the ACT-R cognitive architecture, the p
ath-mapping theory enables models of analogical mapping behavior to incorpo
rate and interface with other problem-solving knowledge. Path-mapping model
s thus can include task-specific skills such as encoding analogs or generat
ing responses, and can make behavioral predictions at the level of real-wor
ld metrics such as latency or correctness. We show that the path-mapping th
eory can successfully account for the major phenomena addressed by previous
theories of analogy. We also describe a path-mapping model that can accoun
t for subjects' incremental eye-movement and typing behavior in a story-map
ping task. We discuss extensions and implications of this work to other are
as of analogy and problem-solving research. (C) 2001 Cognitive Science Soci
ety, Inc. All rights reserved.