M. Braga et al., Early postoperative enteral nutrition improves gut oxygenation and reducescosts compared with total parenteral nutrition, CRIT CARE M, 29(2), 2001, pp. 242-248
Objective: To evaluate the potential clinical, metabolic, and economic adva
ntages of enteral nutrition over total parenteral nutrition.
Design Prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Setting: Department of surgery in a university hospital.
Patients: Two hundred and fifty-seven patients with cancer of the stomach (
n = 121), pancreas (n = 110), or esophagus (n = 26) were randomized to rece
ive postoperative total parenteral nutrition (TPN group, n = 131) or early
enteral nutrition (EEN group, n = 126), The nutritional goal was 25 kcal/kg
/day. The two nutritional formulas were isocaloric and isonitrogenous, and
they were continued until oral intake was at least 800 kcal/day,
Measurements: Morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and treatment
costs were evaluated in all patients. In 40 consecutive patients, selected
nutritional, immunologic and inflammatory variables were studied. Moreover,
intestinal oxygen tension was evaluated by micropolarographic implantable
probes.
Main Results: The nutritional goal was reached in 100/126 (79.3%) patients
in the EEN group and in 128/131 (97.7%) patients in the TPN group (p < .001
), In the EEN group, hyperglycemia (serum glucose, >200 mg/dL) was observed
in 4.7% of the patients vs, 9.1% in the TPN group (p = NS), Alteration of
serum electrolyte levels was 3.9% in the EEN group vs, 13.7% in the TPN gro
up (p < .01), No significant difference was found in nutritional, immunolog
ic, and inflammatory variables between the two groups. The overall complica
tion rate was similar (40.4% for TPN vs, 35.7%, for EEN; p = .52), No diffe
rence was detected for either infectious or noninfectious complications, le
ngth of hospital stay, and mortality. From postoperative day 5, intestinal
oxygen tension recovered faster in the EEN group than in the TPN group (43
+/- 5 mm Hg vs, 31 +/- 4 mm Hg at day 7; p <,001), EEN was four-fold less e
xpensive than TPN ($25 vs, $90.60/day, respectively).
Conclusion: EEN represents a rational alternative to TPN in patients who un
dergo upper gastrointestinal tract surgery for cancer and who clinically re
quire postoperative artificial nutrition.