Troglitazone and liver function abnormalities - Lessons from a prescription event monitoring study and spontaneous reporting

Citation
P. Biswas et al., Troglitazone and liver function abnormalities - Lessons from a prescription event monitoring study and spontaneous reporting, DRUG SAFETY, 24(2), 2001, pp. 149-154
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
DRUG SAFETY
ISSN journal
01145916 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
149 - 154
Database
ISI
SICI code
0114-5916(2001)24:2<149:TALFA->2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate whether there were any cases of liver function a bnormalities possibly associated with troglitazone use in general practice in England. Design: A prescription-event monitoring (PEM) study was undertaken between October 1997 and December 1997. Setting: Data from prescriptions were obtained electronically for the trogl itazone cohort in the immediate postmarketing period. Study Participants: Event data were obtained for a total of 1344 patients. Results: Troglitazone was effective in 394 (75%) of the 529 patients for wh om an opinion was given. The most frequent reasons for stopping treatment I elated to drug tolerability were malaise/lassitude (16 reports), abnormal liver function tests (11 reports) and nausea/vomiting (9 reports). The majo r cause of stopping troglitazone was because the drug was withdrawn from th e market (1101 reports). 30 patients with liver dysfunction were identified from the cohort. In 9 of these patients there were alternative explanation s for the liver dysfunction and hence these patients were not followed up f urther. 21 patients were followed up, for whom 19 questionnaires were retur ned. In 5 patients their liver dysfunction was assessed as possibly related to troglitazone, in 6 patients the liver dysfunction was unlikely to be at tributed to troglitazone, while in 7 patients it was difficult to assess th e causality because of limited information and confounding factors. The rem aining patient was not included as this individual did not fit the inclusio n criteria of the study. Conclusion: Although the cohort is small (the drug was available for only 3 months in the UK), 5 patients with abnormal liver function, considered pos sibly related to troglitazone were detected in this PEM study. It is possib le for PEM to contribute to the elucidation of safety signals in the UK.