Chelation challenge testing has been used to assess the body burden of vari
ous metals. The best-known example is EDTA challenge in lead-exposed indivi
duals. This study assessed diagnostic chelation challenge with dimercaptosu
ccinic acid (DMSA) as a measure of mercury body burden among mercury-expose
d workers. Former employees at a chloralkali plant, for whom detailed expos
ure histories were available (n = 119), and unexposed controls (n = 101) co
mpleted 24-hr urine collections before and after the administration of two
doses of DMSA, 10 mg/kg. The urinary response to DMSA was measured as both
the absolute change and the relative change in mercury excretion. The avera
ge 24-hr mercury excretion was 4.3 mug/24 hr before chelation, and 7.8 mug/
24 hr after chelation. There was no association between past occupational m
ercury exposure and the urinary excretion of mercury either before or after
DMSA administration. There was also no association between urinary mercury
excretion and the number of dental amalgam surfaces, in contrast to recent
published results. We believe the most likely reason that DMSA chelation c
hallenge failed to reflect past mercury exposure was the elapsed time (seve
ral years) since the exposure had ended. These results provide normative va
lues for urinary mercury excretion both before and after DMSA challenge, an
d suggest that DMSA chelation challenge is not useful as a biomarker of pas
t mercury exposure.