We have produced a model to define the linoleate-binding pocket of pea 9/13
-1ipoxygenase and have validated it by the construction and characterizatio
n of eight point mutants. Three of the mutations reduced, to varying degree
s, the catalytic centre activity (k(cat)) of the enzyme with linoleate. In
two of the mutants, reductions in turnover were associated with changes in
iron-coordination. Multiple sequence alignments of recombinant plant and ma
mmalian lipoxygenases of known positional specificity, and the results from
numerous other mutagenesis and modelling studies, have been combined to di
scuss the possible role of the mutated residues in pea 9/13-1ipoxygenase ca
talysis. A new nomenclature for recombinant plant lipoxygenases based on po
sitional specificity has subsequently been proposed. The null-effect of mut
ating pea 9/13-lipoxygenase at the equivalent residue to that which control
led dual positional specificity in cucumber 13/9-lipoxygenase, strongly sug
gests that the mechanisms controlling dual positional specificity in pea 9/
13-1ipoxygenase and cucumber 13/9-lipoxygenase are different. This was supp
orted from modelling of another isoform of pea lipoxygenase, pea 13/9-lipox
ygenase, Dual positional specificity in pea lipoxygenases is more likely to
be determined by the degree of penetration of the methyl terminus of linol
eate and the volume of the linoleate-binding pocket rather than substrate o
rientation. A single model for positional specificity, that has proved to b
e inappropriate for arachidonate-binding to mammalian 5-, 12- and 15-lipoxy
genases, would appear to be true also for linoleate-binding to plant 9- and
13-lipoxygenases.