FDG-PET standardized uptake values in normal anatomical structures using iterative reconstruction segmented attenuation correction and filtered back-projection
Cd. Ramos et al., FDG-PET standardized uptake values in normal anatomical structures using iterative reconstruction segmented attenuation correction and filtered back-projection, EUR J NUCL, 28(2), 2001, pp. 155-164
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Filtered back-projection (FBP) is the most commonly used reconstruction met
hod for PET images, which are usually noisy. The iterative reconstruction s
egmented attenuation correction (IRSAC) algorithm improves image quality wi
thout reducing image resolution. The standardized uptake value (SUV) is the
most clinically utilized quantitative parameter of [fluorine-18]fluoro-2-d
eoxy-D-glucose (FDG) accumulation. The objective of this study was to obtai
n a table of SUVs for several normal anatomical structures from both routin
ely used FBP and IRSAC reconstructed images and to compare the data obtaine
d with both methods. Twenty whole-body PET scans performed in consecutive p
atients with proven or suspected non-small cell lung cancer were retrospect
ively analyzed. Images were processed using both IRSAC and FBP algorithms.
Nonquantitative or gaussian filters were used to smooth the transmission sc
an when using FBP or IRSAC algorithms, respectively. A phantom study was pe
rformed to evaluate the effect of different filters on SUV. Maximum and ave
rage SUVs (SUVmax and SUVavg) were calculated in 28 normal anatomical struc
tures and in one pathological site. The phantom study showed that the use o
f a nonquantitative smoothing filter in the transmission scan results in a
less accurate quantification and in a 20% underestimation of the actual mea
surement. Most anatomical structures were identified in all patients using
the IRSAC images. On average, SUVavg and SUVmax measured on IRSAC images us
ing a gaussian filter in the transmission scan were respectively 20% and 8%
higher than the SUVs calculated from conventional FBP images. Scatterplots
of the data values showed an overall strong relationship between IRSAC and
FBP SUVs. Individual scatterplots of each site demonstrated a weaker relat
ionship for lower SUVs and for SUVmax than for higher SUVs and SUVavg. A se
t of reference values was obtained for SUVmax and SUVavg of normal anatomic
al structures, calculated with both IRSAC and FBP image reconstruction algo
rithms. The use of IRSAC and a gaussian filter for the transmission scan se
ems to give more accurate SUVs than are obtained from conventional FBP imag
es using a nonquantitative filter for the transmission scan.