S. Sultan et al., Endoluminal stent grafts in the management of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a realistic assessment, EUR J VAS E, 21(1), 2001, pp. 70-74
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
Objectives: transfemoral endoluminal aortic management (TEAM) is technicall
y feasible in the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms but it
s advantage over conventional repair is unproved. We report our initial exp
erience, learning curve and technical difficulties encountered during the p
rocess of establishing this novel technique in our institute.
Material and Methods: over a 3-year period 400 cases of abdominal aortic an
eurysms were reviewed; only 58 cases (15%) were suitable for endovascular r
epair under our TEAM protocol and 36 (9%) were offered endovascular interve
ntion. They were mainly high-risk patients (85% ASA III and IV) with a mean
age of 72 years. Thirty-three bifurcated grafts, two straight tube grafts
and one aorto mono-iliac graft were deployed. We oversized the grafts by 15
-20% to the diameter of the aortic neck and both common iliac arteries.
Results: two cases (6%-95% CI: 1-19%) had on-table conversion because of ru
ptured common iliac arteries. Perioperatively there were two deaths from mu
lti-organ failure. Transient renal failure occurred in two patients and thr
ee patients (9%) suffered a non-fatal myocardial infarction. Sixteen percen
t of patients had a groin wound problem. The mean hospital stay was 7 days.
Five minor endoleaks (15%) were identified and sealed at 30 days. One seco
ndary endoleak was identified at 18 months because of a patent juxta-renal
lumbar artery. No secondary cuffs or extensions were used. Mean follow-up w
as 29 months and all grafts remained patent. The technical, clinical, conti
nuous and secondary success rates were 78%, 91%, 89% and 91% respectively w
ith TEAM.
Conclusion: endovascular training, patient selection and learning curve imp
ose an impact on the final outcome. Until a reliable hard point is reached
so that endovascular repair could be exercised in routine practice, the use
of TEAM must be questioned in high-risk patients, and should be performed
under clinical trial conditions using strict selection criteria.