Which method? A food microbiologist's nightmare

Authors
Citation
G. Davey, Which method? A food microbiologist's nightmare, FOOD AUST, 53(3), 2001, pp. 73-75
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition
Journal title
FOOD AUSTRALIA
ISSN journal
10325298 → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
73 - 75
Database
ISI
SICI code
1032-5298(200103)53:3<73:WMAFMN>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
A common dilemma faced by Australian food testing laboratories is the selec tion of the most appropriate microbiological method to meet specific testin g requirements. Frequently food microbiologists seek guidance from NATA, or refer to methods published by Standards Australia. However this often lead s to criticism of either or both organisations because of apparent constrai nts imposed by regulatory requirements, and an inherent inability of Austra lian Standard Methods to keep pace with scientific and technological develo pments, and with innovations in test methods. One potential solution which has been the subject of prolonged debate within and between NATA and Standa rds Australia, is the development of recognised procedures for the validati on of test methods. This paper describes the processes involved in developing Australian Standa rd Methods for food microbiology, examines misconceptions and myths surroun ding their use, explores some solutions which have been developed, and high lights challenges for the future.