The use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is on the increase, not only to
treat haemophilic patients with inhibitors, but also patients with other c
lotting disorders. However, the most appropriate method of monitoring this
treatment remains a question that has yet to be resolved. We studied 24 pla
sma samples from patients receiving rFVIIa treatment (three had haemophilia
A with inhibitors, and three a congenital FVII deficiency) and compared th
e results obtained from the FVII:C and FVIIa assays. Although a good correl
ation between the two methods was obtained (r = 0.91), the values of the FV
II:C method were 1.63 higher than those of the FVIIa method, with a relativ
ely wide margin in the interval of the FVII:C/FVIIa ratios obtained [95% co
nfidence interval (CI) 1.38-1.88, range 0.68-3.68]. This interval became wi
der when we compared values of over 6 IU mL(-1), which led us to conclude t
hat the two methods cannot be considered equivalent. As the FVIIa method sp
ecifically measures FVIIa, and FVII:C assay is known to have a wide interla
boratory variability, we believe that the FVIIa assay would be more suitabl
e for the monitoring of rFVIIa treatment.