In 1997, Congress passed the Adoption and Safe Families Act. The Act amends
Titles IV-B and IV-E of the Social Security Act, which govern slates' fede
rally funded child-protective efforts. Under the terms of the Act, states m
ust conduct a permanency hearing within twelve months after a child enters
foster care to determine whether the child will be returned to the family o
f origin or be "freed" for adoption. In this Essay, Professor Adler argues
that this requirement forces courts and state decision-makers to choose bet
ween two stark alternatives-termination of parental rights and family reuni
fication-and reflects a limited vision of the ideal family, to which only o
riginal and adoptive families conform. Professor Adler argues that this, pe
rvasive "ideology of the ideal family " is a pillar of American legal consc
iousness that throughout the history of American child welfare policy has s
idelined nonconforming approaches and profoundly and detrimentally affected
the lives of faster children. She brings to the foreground a pattern of le
gal consciousness and proposes that lawmakers embrace a wider array of perm
issible family structures to make room for a broader range of possible outc
omes.