Am. Bamberger et al., Progesterone receptor isoforms, PR-B and PR-A in breast cancer: Correlations with clinicopathologic tumor parameters and expression of AP-1 factors, HORMONE RES, 54(1), 2000, pp. 32-37
In the present study, we used Western blot analysis to determine the expres
sion of the progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms, PR-B and PR-A, in breast t
umors (n = 53), and correlated the expression patterns of the two isoforms
with the clinicopathological parameters of these tumors and with expression
of the AP-1 family of transcription factors. Expression of the two PR isof
orms correlated significantly with each other, indicating that the expressi
on of the two isoforms is probably regulated in a correlated fashion. Expre
ssion of both isoforms correlated significantly with expression of the estr
ogen receptor (ER). Furthermore, expression of PR-B was found to correlate
significantly with the absence of ErbB2/neu. For the AP-1 factors, Fra-1 ex
pression showed an inverse correlation with PR-B expression. In contrast, e
xpression of FosB correlated significantly with expression of both isoforms
, and the association was stronger with PR-B expression. An analysis of the
ratio of expression of the two isoforms showed that most of the tumors exp
ressed PR-A levels which were equal or higher than the corresponding PR-B e
xpression levels (together 94% of the analyzed tumors) indicating that, in
mammary carcinomas, a predominance of the PR-A isoform over the PR-B isofor
m seems to be the case. While there was no statistically significant correl
ation with age, staging and histological type, expression of both isoforms
correlated with a more differentiated phenotype (G1/G2 grading). However, t
h is association was stronger for PR-B. Also, a PR-A less than or equal to
PR-B expression level was associated with G1/G2 grading, while a PR-A > PR-
B expression level showed an association with a more undifferentiated pheno
type (G3 grading). The expression level of the two PR isoforms might prove
to be of prognostic and/or predictive value, especially since the two isofo
rms have been shown to be functionally different and to modulate the respon
se of tumor cells to progestins and antiprogestins differently. Copyright (
C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.