Ma. Sampei et al., Comparison of the body mass index to other methods of body fat evaluation in ethnic Japanese and Caucasian adolescent girls, INT J OBES, 25(3), 2001, pp. 400-408
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the body mass index (BMI) an
d its relationship with other methods of body fat evaluation in pre- and po
st-menarcheal, Japanese and Caucasian female adolescents, using hive differ
ent cut-off points for obesity: 28% and 30%.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study with incomplete sampling, using the subject
as the evaluation unit.
SUBJECTS: A total of 436 Japanese and Caucasian female adolescents in two a
ge groups: 10-11 (pre-menarcheal adolescent); and 16-17 (post-menarcheal ad
olescents).
METHODS: For the BMI the cut-off point for thinness was set at the 5th perc
entile of the BMI distribution of the NCHS reference population and the cut
-off point for overweight and obesity was set at the 85th percentile. Body
composition was assessed using foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysi
s (BIA), near-infrared interactance (NIR) and Slaughter skinfold equations
(SKI). The statistical comparison of the methods was performed using the ka
ppa agreement test and the McNemar disagreement test.
RESULTS: In the 10- and 11-y-old girls, the BMI was considerably and signif
icantly correlated with the other methods. The major agreements were: in Ja
panese adolescents BMI x NIR = 82.3% (cut-off point of 28%), BMI x BIA = 85
.7% (cut-off point of 30%); in Caucasian adolescents BMI x NIR = 80.7% (cut
-off point of 28%), BM I x BIA = 87.4% (cut-off point of 30%). The disagree
ment above the diagonal between BMI x NIR was higher within the two groups
for both the cut-off points, revealing that the girls identified as obese b
y the BMI were considered eutrophic by NIR. In the 16- and 17-y-old adolesc
ents, the BMI demonstrated low or no correlation with the other methods. Fu
rthermore, it presented disagreements below the diagonal, revealing that th
e BMI identified fewer obese subjects than the other methods.
CONCLUSION: Among the 10- and 11-y-olds, the BMI presented a good correlati
on with the other methods, independent of ethnicity. The BMI can therefore
be used in place of these methods, although it may underestimate obesity. A
mong the 16- and 17-y-olds, the BMI presented low or no agreement with the
other methods, suggesting that it is probably not a suitable index for this
age-group in studies focusing on the identification of obesity. In such ca
ses the choice of one of the other methods, depending on availability, cost
or technical experience, may represent a better approach.