Comparison of the body mass index to other methods of body fat evaluation in ethnic Japanese and Caucasian adolescent girls

Citation
Ma. Sampei et al., Comparison of the body mass index to other methods of body fat evaluation in ethnic Japanese and Caucasian adolescent girls, INT J OBES, 25(3), 2001, pp. 400-408
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
ISSN journal
03070565 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
400 - 408
Database
ISI
SICI code
0307-0565(200103)25:3<400:COTBMI>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the body mass index (BMI) an d its relationship with other methods of body fat evaluation in pre- and po st-menarcheal, Japanese and Caucasian female adolescents, using hive differ ent cut-off points for obesity: 28% and 30%. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study with incomplete sampling, using the subject as the evaluation unit. SUBJECTS: A total of 436 Japanese and Caucasian female adolescents in two a ge groups: 10-11 (pre-menarcheal adolescent); and 16-17 (post-menarcheal ad olescents). METHODS: For the BMI the cut-off point for thinness was set at the 5th perc entile of the BMI distribution of the NCHS reference population and the cut -off point for overweight and obesity was set at the 85th percentile. Body composition was assessed using foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysi s (BIA), near-infrared interactance (NIR) and Slaughter skinfold equations (SKI). The statistical comparison of the methods was performed using the ka ppa agreement test and the McNemar disagreement test. RESULTS: In the 10- and 11-y-old girls, the BMI was considerably and signif icantly correlated with the other methods. The major agreements were: in Ja panese adolescents BMI x NIR = 82.3% (cut-off point of 28%), BMI x BIA = 85 .7% (cut-off point of 30%); in Caucasian adolescents BMI x NIR = 80.7% (cut -off point of 28%), BM I x BIA = 87.4% (cut-off point of 30%). The disagree ment above the diagonal between BMI x NIR was higher within the two groups for both the cut-off points, revealing that the girls identified as obese b y the BMI were considered eutrophic by NIR. In the 16- and 17-y-old adolesc ents, the BMI demonstrated low or no correlation with the other methods. Fu rthermore, it presented disagreements below the diagonal, revealing that th e BMI identified fewer obese subjects than the other methods. CONCLUSION: Among the 10- and 11-y-olds, the BMI presented a good correlati on with the other methods, independent of ethnicity. The BMI can therefore be used in place of these methods, although it may underestimate obesity. A mong the 16- and 17-y-olds, the BMI presented low or no agreement with the other methods, suggesting that it is probably not a suitable index for this age-group in studies focusing on the identification of obesity. In such ca ses the choice of one of the other methods, depending on availability, cost or technical experience, may represent a better approach.