Ba. Younge et al., The effect of dietary absorbable methionine and lysine concentrations on the milk production and milk composition of grazing dairy cows, IRISH J A F, 39(3), 2000, pp. 359-368
Previous research has shown a response in milk yield, protein concentration
and protein yield to supplementing diets based on grass silage with absorb
able methionine and lysine. The objective of this experiment was to determi
ne the effect on milk yield, protein concentration and yield, and protein c
omposition of supplementing a grass-based diet with these absorbable amino
acids. The experiment was a randomised block design with two treatments usi
ng 52 cows (including 12 heifers) in mid lactation for a 7-week experimenta
l period, the last 4 of which were used to measure treatment effects. The t
reatments were (1) grass ad libitum plus 0.25 kg beet pulp/molasses per day
(Control), and (2) grass ad libitum plus 0.25 kg beet pulp/molasses plus 6
.2 g of absorbable methionine (MetDI) and 8.1 g of absorbable lysine (LysDI
) per day. Both treatment groups grazed together as one herd. The amino aci
ds were supplied in a rumen protected form (Smartamine(TM) RPAN Technology)
and all figures relate to estimated intestinally absorbable methionine and
lysine as a proportion of total digestible supply of amino acids. Estimate
d absorbable methionine and lysine concentrations were increased from sub-o
ptimal proportions of 0.0193 and 0.0689 of PDIE (true protein digestible in
the small intestine) to adequate proportions of 0.0230 and 0.0737 of PDIE
by the supplementation. Optimum proportions for methionine and lysine are 0
.025 and 0.073 of PDIE. There was no significant difference between the tre
atments in milk yield, milk composition, composition of milk protein, grass
intake or blood metabolites. It is concluded that supplementing cows in mi
d-lactation on a grass diet with protected methionine and lysine has no eff
ect on milk yield or constituents at the levels of production achieved in t
his experiment.