Ht. Benzon et al., THE EFFECT OF LOW-DOSE BUPIVACAINE ON POSTOPERATIVE EPIDURAL FENTANYLANALGESIA AND THROMBELASTOGRAPHY, Anesthesia and analgesia, 79(5), 1994, pp. 911-917
We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to determin
e the effect of bupivacaine on postoperative epidural fentanyl analges
ia and thrombelastography in 120 patients who underwent extensive gast
rointestinal or genitourinary surgery. The patients were randomized in
to four groups, 30 patients per group: Group I = epidural fentanyl (EF
), 10 mu g/mL in saline; Group II = EF with 0.1% bupivacaine; Group II
I = EF with 0.15% bupivacaine; and Group nT = EF with 0.2% bupivacaine
. Pain relief was evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS), both at re
st and during coughing, and by a visual rating scale (VRS). The VAS, V
RS, degree of sedation, and side effects (nausea, vomiting, and prurit
us) were evaluated every 2 h from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM, for 24 h after s
urgery. Forced vital capacities (FVCs) were determined before surgery
and at 24 h after surgery. Blood was withdrawn for thrombelastography
(TEG) measurements preoperatively, in the recovery room (PARR), and 24
h postoperatively. The VAS, VRS, sedation scores, changes in postoper
ative FVCs, and the incidence of side effects were not statistically d
ifferent among the four groups. The 24-h total volumes of infusion in
the four groups (146 +/- 40 mt, 140 +/- 38 mL, 142 +/- 40 mL, 124 +/-
21 mL, respectively) were not statistically different from each other.
There were no significant differences in the TEG values [reaction tim
e (R), coagulation time (K), angle (alpha), and maximum amplitude (mA)
] among the four groups at anytime nor was there any difference betwee
n the baseline, PARR, and 24-h TEG values within any group. We conclud
e that the addition of low-dose bupivacaine does not improve the analg
esic effect of an EF infusion or the postoperative coagulation status
in this group of patients.