Mk. Wynia et al., Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information- Report of a national consensus process, J GEN INT M, 16(2), 2001, pp. 100-111
OBJECTIVE: The Ethical Force Program is a collaborative effort to create pe
rformance measures for ethics in health care. This report lays out areas of
consensus that may be amenable to performance measurement on protecting th
e privacy, confidentiality and security of identifiable health information.
DESIGN: Iterative consensus development process.
PARTICIPANTS: The program's oversight body and its expert panel on privacy
include national leaders representing the perspectives of physicians, patie
nts, purchasers, health plans, hospitals, and medical ethicists as well as
public health, law, and medical informatics experts.
METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: The oversight body appointed a national Expert Ad
visory Panel on Privacy and Confidentiality in September 1998. This group c
ompiled and reviewed existing norms, including governmental reports and leg
al standards, professional association policies, private organization state
ments and policies, accreditation standards, and ethical opinions. A set of
specific and assessable expectations for ethical conduct in this domain wa
s then drafted and refined through seven meetings over 16 months. In the fi
nal two iterations, each expectation was graded on a scale of 1 to 10 by ea
ch oversight body member on whether it was: (1) important, (2) universally
applicable, (3) feasible to measure, and (4) realistic to implement. The ex
pectations that did not score more than 7 (mean) on all 4 scales were recon
sidered and retained only if the entire oversight body agreed that they sho
uld be used as potential subjects for performance measurement. Consensus wa
s achieved on 34 specific expectations. The expectations fell into 8 conten
t areas: addressing the need for transparency of policies and practices, co
nsent for use and disclosure of identifiable information, limitations on wh
at information can be collected and by whom, individuals' access to their o
wn health records, security requirements for storage and transfer of inform
ation, provisions to ensure ongoing data quality, limitations on how identi
fiable information may be used, and provisions for meaningful accountabilit
y.
CONCLUSIONS: This process established consensus on 34 measurable ethical ex
pectations for the: protection of privacy and confidentiality in health car
e. These expectations should apply to any organization with access to perso
nally identifiable health information, including managed care organizations
, physician groups, hospitals, other provider organizations, and purchasers
. Performance measurement on these expectations may improve accountability
across the health care system.