Computational optimization Sor design is effective only to the extent that
the aggregate objective function adequately captures designer's preference.
Physical programming is an optimization method that captures the designer'
s physical understanding of the desired design outcome in forming the aggre
gate objective function. Furthermore, to be useful, a resulting optimal des
ign must be sufficiently robust/insensitive to known and unknown variations
that to different degrees affect the design's performance. This paper expl
ores the effectiveness of the physical programming approach in explicitly a
ddressing the issue of design robustness. Specifically, we synergistically
integrate methods that had previously and independently been developed by t
he authors, thereby leading to optimal-robust-designs, We show how the phys
ical programming method can be used to effectively exploit designer prefere
nce in making tradeoffs between the mean and variation of performance, by s
olving a bi-objective robust design problem. The work documented in this pa
per establishes the general superiority of physical programming over other
conventional methods (e.g., weighted sum) in solving multiobjective optimiz
ation problems. It also illustrates that the physical programming method is
among the most effective multicriteria mathematical programming techniques
for the generation of Pareto solutions that belong to both convex and non-
convex efficient frontiers. [S1050-0472(00)00902-8].